Is the official told China's private car is the auto teller machine

 Is the official told China's private car is the auto teller machine
according to Nanjing Automobile Ching-wen vote before the current draft: the first foreign car to pay 20 yuan ning fees, free access 3 days in the city, late pay fees; City Private non-operating within the car to pay 800 yuan per year, free high-speed access the airport, Wei Qi Road Yangtze River Tunnel and other fast channels, such as the annual round trip across the river and to the airport no more than 20 times, second annual ticket costs 300 yuan relief, only income 500. The remaining charges and another vehicle, special toll-free.
thought this program would certainly not lack of charges and hearing procedures to seek public opinion, but unfortunately, Nanjing toll scheme has been submitted to the province, charges the general public with specific program elements do not know, the media remained silent about the relevant departments, the public is concerned, how about the right to information on government decision-making and participation rights?
car rarely open, hang a license is not in Nanjing, Nanjing Open the owners are most concerned about is whether they also buy tickets on? this, the City Development and Reform Commission officials provided a clear answer, all linked to the Nanjing vehicle license must be purchased each year in votes, when annual audit, if not buy, then pay fines.
do this, please Nanjing Trondheim out several heavy city traffic, the traffic control officials experts to more than seven million people to doubts doubts. One expert said that Nanjing is not Many of the road toll can be charged before, and now the implementation of fees and charges, also included these charges before the road can be. The expert also said that people travel costs, including economic costs and time costs, private owners and from time to consider the economic choice travel routes, in fact, reduce travel costs.
Another expert said that the Nanjing-vote system introduced Ching-wen, to a certain stage of urban development and the urgent need for effective transitional measure. expressway networks to stimulate urban economic development, strength of a relatively short time the city can grow, then the implementation of free movement of road network. At present the biggest opposition is the private car owners, and more than 700 million for the general public, the implementation of Ching-wen vote ;, should be able to get the firm support of all members of the public. Nanjing vote after the implementation of Ching-wen, to ease city traffic, and promote the development of the city north and south, and improving urban air quality will play a significant role in car-free people will not object. Even private car owners, because the traffic to enjoy a quick, there will be many owners actively willing to take on each ticket costs 800 yuan.
then one expert emphasized: Ching-wen-vote system to improve the river transport and city traffic, the general public will greatly reduce the cost of travel time. From this perspective, Ching-wen-vote system can reduce travel costs of all the people, although for the municipal finance more of the Huimin measures. From this point of understanding, Nanjing in the Officials do not believe that this group of so-called experts doubts the construction, the following is an extract some users very strong message and the game thread, emotions were running excitement, cursing battle continued. netizens who stood to speak on their respective positions, of course, biases , but they are a normal expression of interest. But the expression of their own interests, in the absence of authority, under the premise of a valid arbitration can only be disrupted battle mm
I rarely open their own private car to the Jiangbei, now a year The annual purchase of 800 votes, not that you in turn will increase the cost of travel?
Why do not charge fees to be included before the road? Do you want to roll back the wheel of history? do not know these experts really do not know or pretend to confused, contradictory economic and time is always two aspects, not the economic loss is loss of time, some people better off on the choice of saving time, some people have plenty of time on the choice of saving the economy, which is well known the truth, already is said not to save.
funny is that the experts said the . This is really slippery world of big audit, as private cars, the reason to go this route will not change to the path. Even if the private car travel has changed the road, this road is nothing but change to that road congestion only, not to mention help people save time, they might even bring new issues to the public.
Nanjing Municipal Government to implement the point increase in GDP data, but actually wiping his face to the leadership of Kim, for some groups to profit, the public did not get any benefits, which requires the Government to the people the benefit of the party in the direction contrary to the expense of people's livelihood is completely set selfish and cover-up, should be immediately corrected. Otherwise, the intensification of public pressure after the spillover conflicts, will very bad image of the government. If we continue this practice continues, stealing say, regardless of the length of time, this session will be the municipal government as the ultimate whipped by history.
examined under the national law, the annual vote is the behavior of the local government, why would the two tied together? because there are mandatory government backed public authority. < br> every citizen is the taxpayers, while the city's roads and bridges are public transport, why not pay for the municipal finance? Why should people pay for?
Yangtze River Bridge, after transfer, in accordance with the current charges conditions in the operating period of years can produce very substantial economic benefits, government buy-back bridge, the implementation of fees vote Ching-wen, is not making money by this move?
to know the money! I received my money, but Jiang Why? I am Bridge Bridge will take up to one year up to 100 times faster until it! to charge for pay-per! not apt to all the money! money-ah!!
implementation of the Ching-wen vote, appear to who is the beneficiary of Jiangbei, but also give the city a few hundred dollars a year road and bridge tolls cost. to the south of the people, naturally do not think pay for others? Moreover, vehicle owners have to pay the relevant taxes, so why pay the second?
Nanjing so many cars, a few hundred dollars every year compulsory National Chiao Tung University, a few years should not be the ; costs cobble together. But the flag, unlimited toll road extended, what is the difference? Moreover, proclaimed that The annual income and use the money to buy back channel, even if the study is in the negotiations, should also have a number of Nanjing people know, so that all reasonable and unreasonable to judge people in Nanjing, the length of time the collection.
years second vote, although the government approved the second best option, but not the best choice, in such a large bearing on the interests of the people, events, or more broadly solicit public opinion to do. fee program can not bypass the use of the highest concerned people that, and only consider the interests of investors. Otherwise, the intensification of contradictions pressure of public opinion after the spill, would be extremely negative image of the government, the policy level officials in Nanjing, in the voices of doubt in overstating the step by step.
over River Tunnel was completed and no, it is a waste of resources? Yangtze River Tunnel has been built, and how charges are also being submitted for approval in the program. because of delay and pending charges, a direct result of spending billions of tunnels built in the Yangtze River, not the normal traffic use. tunneling time is postponed indefinitely the opening of the departments concerned did not give a clear timetable.
side is abandoned tunnel built, one side is the river of Nanjing in Nanjing difficult problems, especially the public Jiangbei public travel, people complain incessantly, is hard to figure out.
people look forward to the completion of the tunnel, the river of time can be shortened to increase integration between South Jiangbei. Now booing, the tunnel built, became a Nanjing Municipal Government took the opportunity to impose charges wonderful excuse! the past, owners of the river in Nanjing, as well as the bridge to go, and it is free, even if what is to take the Bridge is once again pay the money, this, too, makes sense. Now touch a , whether you do not go away, tickets have to pay to do Ching-wen. The Government knew the tunnel built by the , and can also be opened to traffic, why not be open to the public, both to ease bridge congestion, but also can significantly shorten the time to cross the river and improve the efficiency of travel. No matter from which angle, across the river after the dormant tunnel built, later not later than the opening, is a waste of resources. to some extent, government efficiency is not high performance.
for car owners, this 800 yuan to pay some mysterious reason. in Nanjing with most of the cars private cars, the money for the bus for nothing, anyway, pay for government finance; but private cars, it should be out of their pocket, it is not a small burden, potentially more than a year than other cities the burden of paying the cost of 800 yuan! do it fair and reasonable?!
implement Ching-wen vote, according to 800 yuan a year per vehicle estimates, the Government therefore direct income of about one billion a year, but this is only the minimum guarantee revenues. Once the Nanjing Bridge Bridge Government the right to operate all the tunnels and bridges, and tunnels to repurchase a large number of foreign vehicles must pay out of Nanjing. This greater number of charges, would fall into the government pockets! Of course we can not get year in the end the number of foreign vehicles entering and leaving the authority of Nanjing statistics, however, the current Bridge, Bridge, daily traffic, the bridge at a conservative estimate at more than 60,000 traffic, Bridge conservative estimate in more than 50,000 vehicles, the data is not less than 10 million vehicle trips. Nanjing year due to the number of vehicles crossing the river charges, absolutely amazing!
to Nanjing will be implemented, inconsistent state laws and regulations. , which examined the scope of involving the exercise of executive power belongs to the national level the provisions of the tunnel and on the regional vote is completely different concepts. He suggested that if fees are relatively reasonable second vote, who cross the river who foot the bill.
In this regard, the author access to the relevant information. According to should be examined, and no unit may set other conditions. motor vehicle meets the technical standards for national security, traffic management department of public security organ shall issue the inspection mark.
which State Department Guo Ban Fa [2002] No. 31 issued the text the shall not introduce new motor vehicles involved in administrative fees, government funding and government funds projects to strengthen the hh motor vehicle involved in the management fees, toll fees will be shared equally prohibited to all vehicles and mandatory fees; No authorization for increase charges, expanding the range of charge; non-duplication of motor vehicle safety inspection, repeat the periodic motor vehicle inspection charges and fees ride hh put a hook, is it not contrary to national laws and regulations? these provisions made it clear that bundled with the annual vote on the rationality and linked to where?! more importantly, Nanjing vote certainly exists in the negative demonstration effect, if governments are cloned all over the country such it not chaos? people had it not going to rebel? Yan save the credibility of the ruling party?!
Zhongnan University of Economics, Social Development Research Center, Professor Qiao Xinsheng, this approach can easily lead to loss of public support decision-makers. < br> Nanjing University School of Government Professor Huang Jianrong said, traffic, crossing the river tunnels are public goods, the taxpayer has to pay taxes according to law the production and supply of public goods has contributed to, have the right to use these public goods and access to services.
Qiu Lu, Nanjing University Law School professor wind suggested that the Government should closeout publicity, construction of public facilities. We all know that a large portion of these funds for tax revenue, including fuel tax, but also in other urban construction tax, that is, the taxpayer has passed tax, the construction of these public facilities to pay costs. As such, these facilities should be a public product, taxpayers have the right to free use, the Government should not charge, or suspected of self-taxation, which is the local government do not have the permission. Even so, even if the government To urban roads, bridges, tunnels and other public goods, tax, audit and must also be released in the end what to charge for the project is the construction of government loans rather than using the financial resources. honor, conscience professors recommend the collection of Nanjing, the amount of tickets priced at 800 yuan, or why the 900 yuan, to be clear and evidence-based accounts, this would certainly encounter questioned the legitimacy and rationality. She further stated: transport charges on the tax reform of the reform, the maintenance fee and travel before the combined use of fuel tax with the tax levy. road toll. fuel tax, and since the charges are a result of secondary roads to cancel this reform, then, the city government to other secondary roads or highways once again collect the following way to reflect on the cost of tickets, there must be clear provisions of the law, otherwise allegedly double-charged. tunnels, bridges, including the use of fee basis, tax reform, some provisions of this regulation is clearly lagging behind, and the existing policies has changed, such as the one in the transportation tax, the Government has been part of the repayment of the road can not continue to pay the government to repay the loan or road raised funds should primarily be to withdraw from the fuel tax revenue, in this case, and then reference has lagged behind the reasonable. cancel the maintenance fee after the fact, still contain the fuel tax for road maintenance, and then to a certain percentage of the collected returned to the local government. In this regard, the annual vote is indeed a
do not buy tickets on the vehicles pass the time examined. However, the provisions of regulations already: vehicle inspection, mandatory fees suspects.
Back in 2002 the State Council has set up the ;, is illegal? is clearly incompatible with the State Council
Wuhan in the past is bound by the charges, the state built a bridge and construction financing charges tied Bridge, caused widespread controversy, CCTV canceled after the exposure.
Nanjing Ching-wen-vote system in the existing programs, the basaltic Lake Tunnel, west of the city roads, Lung Poon Road Tunnel into the range of charge, Nanjing University School of Law Professor Qiu Lu wind that this is also open to question. Highway Management Ordinance. bridges, tunnels, etc.. (military vehicles) tolls for the repayment of loans or funds raised, but does not provide for non-use of these vehicles bridge or tunnel charges.
In addition, the State Council on the governance and arbitrary charges to motor vehicles Road site to rectify the issue of notice (Guo Ban Fa [2002] 31) the third is also clear that governments at all levels must be strictly related to the approval of motor vehicles and management fees, toll fees will be shared equally prohibited to all vehicles and force charge. So, the annual vote of all vehicles, including not using the vehicle tunnel across the river tied together with fees, the practice is clearly illegal.
to now seems settled, ready to come out. But if in the opinion that a comprehensive reform in the context of opposition started, right? timely? If Nanjing, relevant government departments concerned of the fees charged by the people's livelihood, initially prudent and positive attitude is, intended to return to help the people free to improve the government image, and later publicly released information, communicate with the people, but now we can see that the interests of related parties as of the game, buy-back cost pressures to cause trouble, word to the money they finally bow down to public opinion. This is really a decision, has become the policy tone. on unrealistically high prices, national and local government revenues and frequently released at the punch, and purpose is to compete with the people of the local financial train pulled to the right track. In such a situation, not burdens Instead, they will will find how similar it with taxes: annual mandatory fee (mandatory); whatever you have, but Jiang is not in Nanjing, as long as the Soviet Union A hanging signs on to buy all tickets (free of); Once the plan was finalized, to what were collected, the collection of the number of final word, not a decade or two will not cancel the (fixed). Of course, where did this power to tax to tax, so a high-sounding, the program is simple, to ignore public opinion, in many places has been into mice on the streets, the state banned the transport shared equally binding and enforce the charging system, is even some policy department of Nanjing as the balance of revenue and expenditure of the magic, step forward.
According to information, as of the previous year, Nanjing Vehicle ownership has exceeded one million mark, totaling 1,004,500, an average of 7 to have a motor vehicle. Statistics show that motor vehicle growth was particularly rapid in Nanjing, the average daily volume on the card to reach a thousand vehicles. This represents , Nanjing, today no less than 1.5 million motor vehicle ownership, except that part free of charge, a conservative estimate in a single year had a good year, several hundred million votes in the richer. huge piece of cake, it is inevitable coveted.
If the car consumption In the past few years of luxury consumption, higher taxes is a social justice, then today, the private car is basically a means of transport into the mass consumer goods, especially driven a high price to some corner of the outer suburbs and the city , driving into the city is almost a necessity. So, when the owners have already paid to the state and local vehicle purchase tax, vehicle use tax, fuel tax, urban maintenance and construction tax, and so the taxpayer after the payment of taxes has been shared the country, urban road construction costs, should be entitled to free use of all public transport when the roads, but once again the city's bridges, tunnels, highway construction bill, otherwise the loss of access rights. this, having a double-charged? Operators not unreasonable charges?
In addition, lack of revenue would levy new taxes, new names, transportation network will take the vehicle users to adjust the layout of surgery, so it goes, can also charge the next step road wear fees, environmental control costs, not a congestion charge? world 10 million kilometers of toll roads in China accounted for nearly our more than 80,000 km, the resumption of traffic and tolls should not be received by the public has long been widely criticized, and it is unreasonable charges on time and gradually clean up standard, Nanjing have to charge tolls in how the pains, the truth is due to huge financial lure, is bound to be a lack of long-term and sustainable development of myopia.
Nanjing upcoming vehicle traffic, if people wish to take the odds and, with the dubious interests of the people. A government for the sake of the people, only people to profit, not profit to the people. and we also believe that long-term coordinated and sustainable development and urban point of view, to create service-oriented government, not the paid service-oriented government. a government for the public power for the people, their financial commitment to more public duties should reduce the burden on poor people.
Sohu car for the special manuscript paper, No authorization is forbidden to allow Sohu car! If reproduced please indicate the source and author name!