Hegelian dialectic is the German classical philosophy one of the most important results

 Hegelian dialectic is the German classical philosophy one of the most important results. The basic idea is the concept of dialectical development. It is the first time the history of the natural and spiritual world, described as a process, several described as in constant motion, change and development among and attempted to reveal its internal relations, which guessed the dialectics of objective things. But reverse the relationship between subjective and objective, is built on the basis of idealism. Marx and Engels drew criticism in which the rational core, abandoned its idealistic system, the creation of a materialist dialectics.



nature of material desires in the Hegelian dialectic as I know the application, I appreciated the most was his comments on the self-consciousness.

He believes that self-consciousness is impossible to exist in isolation. If you sense there is to inspect their own, it must be based on some kind of control. In other words, people have to have a Self-consciousness is by no means a simple awareness of the individual as the center of it.

for all mankind, the The reason of this problem in serious Weijian, precisely because the human animal as a reference only, it may understand ourselves. But the human spirit, but in all animals maintained a detached position in which the spirit of self-awareness will be thrown into a hopeless situation with no frame of reference being.

the most profound love is love itself. But he must be through the love others, or hate other people's way to show self-love. Whether looking at his papers a hundred points on the red complacent, or pointing Jiangshan Jiyangwenzi, self, are outsiders in through the Through a set of external objects, self-awareness built up. But now, self-awareness to

will find that any of the external object is Thus, self-consciousness and would have to construct between external and independent from a special love-hate (love-hate) relationship.



This is a strange paradox relationship. On the one hand, there is no Thus, self-consciousness from birth, to be stuck in the The most important means to resolve the pain is through the part of foreign objects into the self, to eliminate its external, so that we do stop the inner struggle for the This is the essence of material desires.



Hegelian dialectics dialectics of the real thought. The basis of his anti-Marxist dialectics is the (Cartesian rationalism school and others is the foundation doctrine, the general principles that they advocate the use of a knowledge foundation), that is, not as he thinks the only reason Descartes, who sent said, be able to find one universal truth, and then in his capacity as theory. This is reflected in his Edit this paragraph



his theory against - the new universal concept or principle The concept of absolute or universal principles (or the absolute principle of the universal concept is Hegel called that the spirit of his time in Germany has reached - that philosophy in his reach, like Marx, after the firm view that capitalism should be the same as communism. This is a problem in Hegel's philosophy, but there are some more serious problems. I have previously said that a Hegel's dialectic is the anti-universal principles, but the general principles of dialectics is not it? Hegel as a general principle is clear, so we must oppose the dialectics dialectics!

Hegelian dialectic is the logic of the main character (the concept of nature, the nature of propositions), he is the dialectic as the logic to do (that is, speculative logic, dialectical logic). His Seoul accepted the induction camp this idea, usually from a relative sense, we must not not have the so-called antithesis; his antithesis is the subject of the opposition of the concepts, propositions and examples; co-title is a higher level, more basic universal concepts and propositions.

Hegel is in this However, note that here only refers to the traditional logic of the traditional forms of deductive logic, inductive logic does not include, because inductive logic is not a summarized in the premise minor premise.

many mistakes, that is, if that is the form of dialectic logic (including inductive logic) in subversion. In fact, formal logic is through deductive and inductive use of complementary and alternative, to compensate for the lack of deductive logic, that is, inductive inductive 1 → 2 → 1 → deduction deduction deduction 2 → 3 → induction 3 → ... .... Here, Anti-title 1

form is through inductive and deductive logic of the use of complementary and alternative to make up for lack of both, and here the lack of circulation This is expressed as early as Aristotle's thoughts on.

Hegel Aristotle does not follow the correct path, but only absorbed the empirical, inductive thinking of sending some of the right, the repair of the rationalist Cartesian thought. Thus Hegel's philosophy is modified Cartesian rationalism, which is that people will also Hegel's philosophy as the root cause of rationalism. Because of his thoughts absorbed some correct ideas of empiricism, so his Cartesian rationalism is more than reasonable, more realistic reflection of the dynamic theory of human development, rather than Cartesian rationalism is described a static picture of human knowledge.

We have already said, Cartesian rationalism is the basis for doctrine, basic (basic concepts, axioms), once established, it is fixed, and all other concepts, principles are from these basic interpretation of concepts and axioms out, this is the performance of Cartesian rationalism as the static root causes; Hegel's rationalism empiricism due to the absorption of some of the right ingredients, he believes there is no fixed foundation of his Dialectics is the anti-foundationalism, and therefore is dynamic.

many people say is a static logic formal logic, dialectical logic is dynamic logic, on the grounds that formal logic is the study of quantitative things, and dialectical logic is the study of qualitative change things. This argument is wrong, absurd, and simply do not understand the substance of Hegel's dialectic. Dialectics (I only recognized the Hegelian dialectic, Hegel's dialectical logic does not recognize) the reason is dynamic, because it is anti-foundationalism, or it is based on the dynamic changes; formal logic is the reason why static, because it is based, it has a fixed, static base.

but needs to be emphasized is that formal logic here refers only to deductive logic, not including the inductive logic. Formal logic is a multi-meaning words, it is often specifically refers to deductive logic (including traditional deductive logic and modern deductive logic); also often refers to the modern mathematical logic (modern deductive logic); For as with the dialectical logic relative to the other logic in the form of logic ( that is, including the traditional deductive logic, deductive logic of modern, traditional inductive logic, the logic of modern inductive logic), mainly the Soviet Union, China, due to the ideological struggle that year, this sense of formal logic to teach in our book now usually direct funding, described as logic. Ambiguity of the language,UGG boots, people often refer only to the form of deductive logic, static logic, inductive logic out into a whole that contains the static nature of formal logic, this is extremely wrong. In fact, where Aristotle, deductive logic, inductive logic through static and become a dynamic, that is, deduction and induction complementary, alternative use, so that the formal logic becomes dynamic.

Therefore, the amended Hegel's rationalism Although the ratio of the Cartesian rationalism is more correct, than Aristotle, but the kind of . Therefore, we should get rid of Hegel's using Aristotle's

In addition, such and limited. One small part of the objective universe, which is the objectivity of human characteristics; but who also has the ability to understand the objective universe, which is characteristic of people's subjectivity. Though there is the ability to understand the objective universe, but people this ability is not infinite, transcendent, but limited experience.

a person can not one-time realized the truth of the universe (if that is the case, there is no so-called dialectical development of human knowledge has), but only through them can sense (including human senses created by human perception and observation tools, test tools, perceived) to summarize the world. When we summarize these can be perceived within the world of knowledge and rules, we can, through deduction and inference on the unknown world to predict. When we can perceive the world, after expanding the scope of this previously summarized in a small area of the perception of the world, not necessarily the knowledge and rules can be applied, and which we need to conclude a new, wider range of knowledge and laws. Awareness and knowledge of people is such progress.

the objective world that exists between men and women, about the positive and negative, antagonistic properties of this size, these are just some special cases the objective world, there are one-third of the objective world properties, four properties, multisection property , infinite attributes of things. We have no reason to ignore these things, but only half of the property concerned about those things. And it is precisely the objective described in immeasurable subjective attribute, and the subjective, objective and precisely attribute is immeasurable, and this is the logic of human science basis of internal and external contacts.

The logic of his doctrine of Hegel once as the spirit of a limited what used to be Has been very frank recognition of Hegel, his logic is And we need to do is As Hegel said, Hegel's philosophy to establish so fine, but why would quickly abandoned it? Because he established the

In fact, Hegel's then deduced from towering buildings. Although Hegel's dialectical philosophy is to amend the interpretation of school philosophy.

modified Cartesian by Hegel's rationalism, empiricism into some of the content to build his empiricism, rationalism into some of the content to build our That is, I netizens origin and the origin of induction,

also stated that the Hegelian dialectic is the analysis and synthesis method combination. I would say today said logic analysis and synthesis method of induction in general as a finishing method of emotional information. In our current book of logic, induction, is divided into two parts: inductive reasoning, and some method of sorting emotional material. And inductive reasoning, including a simple enumeration, analogy, find cause and effect five methods, probability statistics, etc; finishing materials, methods include emotional observation, experiment, comparison, classification, analysis, synthesis, statistics of the sampling, averaging number, and hypotheses and so on.

In short, we want to establish as from Locke's Rather than Hegel's In other words, Hegel's

thinking tools does not mean that the local validity of the thing itself, but they can not abandon the extreme of thinking, this is the dialectic thinking polarization problem, pointing fingers is not equal to the moon the moon itself, and not extreme to do finger. the truth is not in the text can be interpreted into.

idealist ontological materialism is no essential difference between real, but the concept of the problem, is absolutely monism, rigid.

only materialism and idealism in epistemology makes sense, but it is precisely the subjective idealist who Methodology, materialism is precisely the objective scientific methodology and science were unified in one study, people continue to inward in the reverse himself, outside the main object of increasing consistency in the understanding of adventure, and constantly think outside the paranoid, in human learning and science collide constantly back and forth to each other forward, human values to guide scientific and scientific support to expand the concept of human science, and the living will lead the continuous development of science and human science, human science and science linkage between normalized to others.

of often contradictory understanding of the person being treated as real, actual development time, that was originally used to understand the contradictions caused by their superficial understanding, so the value of three points on the fusion of materialism and lies idealism in one, by constantly being materialistic, through the continued anti-idealism, then the positive and negative together, to complete a new degree of awareness, and who is the subject of this recognition process, it is precisely three o'clock on the Logic of people special, and we both need evidence, also need to rational reflection, relying solely on that point is a point of dogma, talk about their relationship that is has two points, both talk about their interactions with each other and against the normalized joint understanding of the dynamic phase is the co- Three of.

all the world are learning in the final analysis people look at the world's knowledge, is the month that both the absolute relativity of being conceived in particular, from the absolute nature of the specific relative changes can only talk, but can not talk value, because from the specific relative value of the reference system can not be quantified, and therefore can not talk about the value of right and wrong, so it is easy to see that science and the delicate relationship between human learning, this relationship is precisely the trajectory of the development of human thinking, and this trajectory is precisely industry consistent with the theoretical framework of three:

1, the first stage: Human completely dominant, science be suppressed, this time only the introspection of subjective idealism,Discount UGG boots, and not allowed out to explore consistency in the subject and object, the use of scientific principles, resulting in people's thinking, only the methodology of introspection, and a lack of consistency out of subject and object exploration methodology, employing thorough study of thinking through all of this is that the error of human nature is the field of reverse himself, and scientific study if the user will become the standard test using the error object of the mind disposes the situation,UGGs, which will override the property on the wrong thing at the moment than the human deification of the gods; This is the theology of human science than science show stage.

2, the second phase: Scientific completely dominant, human oppressed, this time only the outward and objective exploration of subject and object consistency materialistic, but does not allow inward introspection in the areas of Human use of the principles of the original, because the same result in a person's thinking, only the main object of methodological consistency, and lack of inward introspection methodology consistent with the scientific thinking through everything thoroughly, and this is another stage that the mistake of being so-called overkill it, science is the main object of consistency out adventure, and people will learn if the use of scientific criteria into the same rigid thinking man's rock record for errors in the external situation of the pure, the materials above the person above errors, such as we saw in western economics is the current things but not people of means. People into slaves of the moment thing; This is the scientific study of the physical science than people show stage.

3, the third stage: Stage Human resurgence, this time to reflect on science and human science, rely on each other, each control: inward, subjective introspection of Man needs idealism out of subject and object exploration consistency to support and expand the science; and external consistency of scientific exploration and the main object of inward introspection must rely on the subjective idealist who has learned to experience and reflection; so obvious that no matter who are learning or science is the dogma of the theory, only under the leadership of the living to the people of learning and science collide in misconduct, continue to rely on each other, will each continue to bring out the paranoia inherent in the theory of dogma, making the theory of continuous improvement; This is the Science and mutual promotion of the general people who study science show stage.

Human activity only in the protection of human values and human rights will be restricted on the science, and scientific and technological achievements are only available to limit the expansion of the scope of that person's social and natural space of Thinking outreach. People exist,UGG bailey button, are alive. The living do not need from the theory, but from real life.

the actual body of the earth that it not an activity. Activity is a manifestation of action, death is an attempt to change to such a doctrine and solidified. For example, the activity is the natural changes in the activity of life is change. The activity of natural cure is the science dealing with the doctrine of active life is the cure and treatment of human science dogma. So the science of external and internal people to learn the solidification of two things (knowledge combined), only real people will continue, driven by the evolution of the completion time and time again process.

first truth is a complete system of knowledge, at some stage in terms of,

there is only a good theory, but there is no people and internal and external relations of the theory. essentially all of the researchers is a great religion is to teach the truth, we believe there is a belief that truth exists.

science and human science are two different aspects of paranoid accumulation of knowledge is the human search for knowledge of external and internal structure, they are driven continuously push forward the evolution of paranoia of truth, and could accommodate people of Science's just not a theory but a living person, so there is someone of high school through science, or science high school extraordinary things, they explore two different aspects, there is no higher than the question of who disciplines, internal and external both areas, not to each other using each other's standards to suppress the other, the scientific development can not deny that man, human and development can not deny science, human studies can only be to guide people to live with the constraints, science can only go through life support of the people who study and revision.

They have a linkage between the normalization of relations, human science is a human internal introspection, science is the main object of the external consistency of experience, human science is subjective idealism, science is objective and materialistic, of course, under the main link in the human will be one objective for the present. people need to learn the subjective and objective idealism and materialism to practice development, and scientific materialism and objective idealism need people to learn to verify and subjective experience. to guide learning and science were the only living person, rather than a theory. people are changing the dynamic of living life, so science and human science will also be a link under the linkage between this normalized as a dynamic process: Constraints on scientific needs of people with experience, people need science to develop and learn support, materialism and idealism is done by people the dynamic interaction of the overall process of normalization.

essence, science and human science are the expression of external and internal paranoia, paranoia just need to live these curing people can continue to break through the promotion paranoia, is the so-called Law for the million idealism, not reality phase. man of Science as a link person is under the constant evolution of paranoia. What is the theoretical maximum but not a living person, Even the people, nor is truth itself and above all, can only say of their own self-nature contains a holographic universe, the status of taste perception.

language and human thinking as the full moon of the finger pointing, we can not believe that It is the moon itself, not to the extreme fingers cut off. otherwise the former will fall into a conceptual world, which is delusional world. development of the theory shows that the time has come ternary theory is. In fact Buddha also In the Diamond Sutra said

: Therefore, in the text between truth and the truth is not in the text between. There are also wonderful moral elaborated by the > For Apple, only you personally eaten, plus the text description of the nature experience you can have, or even the best written description does not mean that Apple itself is the reason why the. any of you feel.